List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Identify source and use of all utilities on plant | 1.1 | Obtain current services diagram or schematic for plant |
| 1.2 | Identify all items of equipment using utilities |
| 1.3 | Identify source of each utility |
| 1.4 | Identify utility properties (e.g. pressure, voltage, current) as supplied |
| 1.5 | Determine required utility properties (e.g. from engineering specification) for each item of equipment using each utility |
|
2 | Determine actual consumption of utilities | 2.1 | Get information showing consumption of utilities by the plant and plant equipment |
| 2.2 | Get information showing actual utility properties as used by each plant item |
| 2.3 | Physically check each item of equipment for signs of inefficient utility use (e.g. faulty steam traps and leaks) |
| 2.4 | Compile report/database showing actual usage of utilities and observed problems |
|
3 | Determine efficiency of use | 3.1 | Determine theoretical consumption of utilities for equipment items from engineering specifications, by calculation or other methods |
| 3.2 | Compare actual consumption of utilities with theoretical consumption |
| 3.3 | Determine inefficient users of utilities |
| 3.4 | Compile report/database showing efficiency of use of utilities |
|
4 | Take required action to improve utility efficiency | 4.1 | Rank inefficient users in priority order for remediation based on costs and business requirements |
| 4.2 | Investigate and determine causes of inefficiency in the higher ranked users |
| 4.3 | Develop plans to remove the causes of inefficiency |
| 4.4 | Identify any health, safety and environmental (HSE) implications of planned actions and address prior to any implementation of changes |
| 4.5 | Consult with relevant stakeholders regarding HSE implications and the implementation of these plans |
| 4.6 | Initiate appropriate action for items within scope of authority |
| 4.7 | Follow through on items to facilitate a timely completion |
| 4.8 | Report/make recommendations on required improvements which are beyond scope of authority to action |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
analyse and interpret schematics, technical information, performance data and operational practices to determine actual and theoretical consumption of utilities for the site/plant being examined
isolate the causes of problems and to be able to distinguish between causes of problems/alarm/fault indications, such as:
poor/inappropriate quality supply of utility
equipment failure (e.g. faulty steam trap and fouled heat exchanger)
operational problem (inappropriate usage pattern of utility)
set priorities for action that take into consideration factors, including plant key performance indicators, health, safety and environmental (HSE) implications, the hierarchy of control, options for simple/quick solutions versus those requiring a capital project and other relevant business factors
develop plans to improve utility efficiency
communicate and consult effectively with internal and external stakeholders.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
methods for calculating theoretical consumption
plant equipment, its characteristics and limitations
problem isolation techniques
problem analysis techniques
usage of utilities by plants and equipment
requirements for utilities, properties, usage patterns and supply
typical causes of inefficiencies at the plant or equipment and possible solutions
systems operating parameters and system integrity limits.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or practical, assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
It is not necessary for the recommended improvements in utility efficiency to be complete for the purposes of this unit.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.